Friday, September 30, 2005

The BevMo Saga

I don't usually talk about myself here. I don't feel that my life is particularly interesting or entertaining. I do make exceptions every now and then, because while my life may not be so entertaining, my suffering is. Let me explain.

(A) I am overweight. I used to be obese, but ever since I graduated from college, I've been dieting because I knew that I would be relying on a bicycle as my only means of conveyance, and I didn't want to have a heart attack. So I'm not obese any more, just overweight. Fat. It's hard for fat guys to ride a bicycle for any reasonable distance, but I'm determined to combat the fat, you see. Enough about the fat, the stage has been set.

(B) A second piece of background for my story is BevMo. BevMo has become an inside joke with some of my friends because I once misheard the name and an idiotic conversation followed. When I moved to California, I was delighted to discover that BevMo is not just a web site, it's a real store. So I had to check it out. Their selection is quite good, and that matters because of background tidbit (C).

(C) As most of my friends know, I adore Scotch whisky. I try to stress exactly how much I love it, but I'm not sure people actually believe me. I like to explain by pointing out that if I had been offered the opportunity to apprentice with a master distiller in Scotland instead of being admitted to a graduate program for history, I would have had a very hard decision to make.

(D) T-Mobile screws loyal customers. Whereas most mobile companies reward their customers when it comes time to renew contracts, T-Mobile figures you're going to stay anyway, and offers you nothing. I wanted a new Sidekick II (because my old Sidekick was really falling apart and 18 months had passed), and T-Mobile refused to make me a reasonable deal. I told them that if I were a new customer, I would be able to get one for free and that they were, in effect, punishing me for being a loyal customer. They told me that they were sorry I felt that way. But sorry wouldn't get me a free Sidekick II. So, I told them that I would leave, get a no-contract phone for three months (taking my phone number with me) and I would return after 90 days as a new customer. And I would have my Sidekick II for free. It would be a hassle, but it was the principle that mattered. 90 days have now passed, and I'm not sure if I really want the Sidekick II. For the moment, I have a very crappy Nokia that can't do anything modern phones can except perhaps make and receive calls.

So here is how those four unrelated bits of my personal history combined to screw me on the evening of the 28th. Because of (C) I decided to find a decent liquor store. Naturally, as per (B) my choice was BevMo. Because of (D) I didn't have any handy electronic way to note the directions or even to write down the address. I loathe paper documents (except maybe very old books). But the directions were very simple. Get on San Pablo Avenue and go. Go until you hit BevMo. At this point, you may find it useful to consult the map (click on it to get the full version), because it makes what happened so much clearer:

map

I live in Berkeley, and my apartment is point 1 on the map. I knew that BevMo was fairly close, 3.4 miles away in fact, so I figured that even though (A), I should still try to make it to (B). BevMo is point 2 on the map. It would be good exercise, I thought, and I would see if I've really improved any.

6.8 miles (round trip) might not seem like a lot to normal people, but I remember falling over on the side of a road in a ditch (to lie down from exhaustion) when I tried to rollerblade around Central Park in Manhattan. I'm not normal. In fact, because of (A), I always assume that any tiredness I feel when I'm biking must be because I'm out of shape. However, I did realize that perhaps something was wrong because I had left my apartment at 7:39 PM, and the time was 8:30 PM. I had biked for 50 minutes. I guess that my average speed had to be between 10 and 15 miles per hour. Surely, I was not so out of shape that in 50 minutes of biking I had not yet traversed 3.4 miles. I knew that BevMo (point 2 on the map) was in Albany. I couldn't remember if I'd seen Albany. But I knew that I had seen El Cerrito and Richmond. I tend to forget the spatial relations between those three towns, so I thought Albany might be coming up.

Then I passed the San Pablo police station. I biked as far as 14121 San Pablo Avenue (point 3 on the map), before I called Kaitlen (on my crappy Nokia) and asked her to look up what I couldn't, thanks to (D). Kaitlen told me that I was 10.7 miles from home. Somehow, I had overshot my mark by seven miles. That's 200%. I felt tired not only because of (A) but also because I had already ridden more one-way than I had planned to round-trip.

So, I started to bike back. I hoped I might hit BevMo on the way back. I had passed dozens of liquor stores, but thanks to (B), I wanted to hit BevMo. Not any other liquor store. Well, I did eventually find BevMo. But BevMo closes at 9:00 PM. It was past 9:00 PM. By about ten minutes.

So I continued to bike back home. I stopped for about ten minutes to pick up some food to bring back home. I got home at 10:00 PM. Despite (A), I biked 21.4 miles last night. But I never made it to (B), thanks to (D) and my inability to recognize that (10.7 > 3.4). And so (C) still goes unfulfilled.

Labels: ,

Thursday, September 29, 2005

Hi, My Name is Donald . . .

Arrested Development is quite possibly the funniest (live-action) show on television these days. For a brief moment in the most recent episode (second episode of season three), they flashed this very real image on the screen and it was sheer comedic genius:

Donald Rumsfeld shakes Saddam Hussein's hand, 1983
(Donald Rumsfeld shakes Saddam Hussein's hand, 1983)

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, September 20, 2005

Optimisim

While Eshan continues to have great faith in the American ability to remain innovative, I have long maintained a much more pessimistic outlook. We are regressing: the engines of our innovation are faltering under a severe burden of ideology. In a nation where 42% of the population believes that "life has existed on Earth in its present form since the beginning of time," and another 18% believes that evolution is guided by an intelligent being, we are compelled, then, to put our hopes in the 26% who believes in evolution via natural selection (leaving 10% who simply do not know and another 4% who believe in evolution of some sort, but are not sure what the mechanism of evolution might be). It can be argued that 26% of the population is a large enough proportion to sustain our position as a leader in scientific innovation, but the proposal seems unlikely to me. The only reason we have not yet stumbled is because we import so much brainpower from the rest of the world, but as America becomes more hostile towards science, that stream will dry up, too. Throughout much of history, science and religion have not been mutually exclusive, but as we find ourselves reaching a point in science where it demands to be divorced from religion, more and more Americans are taking the wrong side. Since nearly two-thirds (64%) of Americans are "open to" the teaching of creationism alongside evolution in our schools (and 38% want creationism taught instead of evolution), it's pretty clear that our children won't have a chance in the global market against children who are taught, I don't know, science.

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, September 7, 2005

America's cash flow

A lot of people have been arguing that our fiscal policy is unsustainable. I've been giving Americans the benefit of the doubt in many respects, but isn't it our own fault, as a nation, for voting into office a president who made it perfectly clear that he planned on spending money we don't have while cutting taxes (which by all accurate accounts disproportionately benefited the people who least need a government handout)? "Dynamism" and "responding to change" were never considered to be our president's strong suits. And "planning for a rainy day" is something pansy liberals do, not resolute, strong, security-minded conservatives, right? So, Thomas Friedman's opinion piece today makes sense:
Besides ripping away the roofs of New Orleans, Katrina ripped away the argument that we can cut taxes, properly educate our kids, compete with India and China, succeed in Iraq, keep improving the U.S. infrastructure, and take care of a catastrophic emergency - without putting ourselves totally into the debt of Beijing.
(nytimes.com/2005/09/07/opinion/07friedman.html)

But it's not all a matter of lacking resources. Even though it would be nice to stop amassing debts that I'm going to have to pay (not to mention my children, unless we all pick up and leave America) , we do have the capability to do a lot more than we did. Christopher Hitchens correctly diverts the attention back to the real problem:
The United States has a trillion-dollar economy and a massive and sophisticated military, which is quite capable in competent hands of combating rogue-state dictators and jihadist maniacs, while simultaneously ensuring the safety of all its citizens, at least against the more predictable acts of God or the more predictable attacks of the extremely godly. And there are billions left over after these expenditures, which we choose to waste (in my opinion) on the huge diversion of manpower and resources to the "Drug War" and to "Missile Defense."
(slate.com/id/2125741)

Labels: , ,